01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Benfica B or draw (X2)67%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
Liga Portugal 212°11 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 0–0. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Feirense vs Benfica B (Liga Portugal 2, Saturday, 24 October 2026): Feirense win 36%, draw 26%, Benfica B win 37%. Expected goals (xG): Feirense 1.27, Benfica B 1.41. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 50%, both teams to score 55%. Double chance: Feirense or draw 63%, Benfica B or draw 64%. Prediction updated Saturday, 17 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
The text contains an unsupported claim: the specific betting odds "William Hill offers Benfica B at odds of 2.60" are not part of the provided facts and appear fabricated.
Corrected text:
Feirense's recent form is troubling. Six consecutive losses cast a long shadow over their chances against Benfica B, despite the statistical model giving them a 36% win probability. The visitors are almost evenly favored at 37%, with their superior recent performance and head-to-head advantage tipping the scales slightly in their favor. The numbers reveal a narrow edge for Benfica B in expected goals and outcomes, underlining their stronger position in the table.
The expected goals tell a story of potential opportunities for both sides, with Benfica B slightly ahead at 1.41 to Feirense's 1.27. Yet, the hosts have an intriguing defensive stat: they allow fewer expected goals against per match (1.2) compared to Benfica B's (1.7). This could be crucial in a tightly contested game where possession is key, as both teams favor control of the ball.
Historically, albeit in a limited sample of four matches since 2023, Benfica B have come out on top three times out of four encounters with Feirense. While small, this data suggests a psychological edge, reinforced by Benfica B's current league form. Feirense's solitary win offers little comfort against a backdrop of ongoing struggles and a paltry single point in the standings.
Goals might be in short supply, with the model offering a 50% chance of more than 2.5 goals and an identical likelihood for both teams scoring. The most probable scorelines hover around 1-1, 0-1, and 1-2, indicating a tight affair. Given this, a 1-1 draw seems plausible, yet a 1-2 victory for Benfica B is equally within reach if they capitalize on their momentum.
The finely balanced nature of this encounter is reflected in the closely matched probabilities across the board.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Feirense | X | 2 · Benfica B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.55 | 3.15 | 2.62 |
| LeoVegas | 2.50 | 3.10 | 2.55 |
| Nordicbet | 2.55 | 3.15 | 2.62 |
| Pinnacle | 2.65 | 3.35 | EV+ 1% 2.70 |
Odds updated 24 Oct, 04:20
2.51 → 2.65
3.28 → 3.35
2.77 → 2.70
2.00 → 2.02
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 17/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Liga Portugal 2 data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Feirense | Benfica B |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 13 |
| xPoints | 7.3 | 8.7 |
| xG per match | 0.98 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.32 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.16 | 0.47 |
| Playing style | Feirense | Benfica B |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.61 | 0.47 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.67 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 19 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.35 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.66 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 352 | 372 |
| Passes against per match | 265 | 297 |
| Switches of play per match | 28.6 | 33.1 |
| Long balls per match | 40 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Feirense | Benfica B |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.09 |
| Corners per match | 5.7 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 4.7 | 5.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.47 | 0.45 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.42 | 0.63 |
| Other | Feirense | Benfica B |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| The goalkeepers | Diego Altube Suárez (Feirense) | Diogo José de Nazaré e Jesus Ferreira (Benfica B) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 27 | 30 |
| Save % | 75% | 91% |
| xG prevented | 42% | 60% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Benfica B a 37% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Feirense 36%, draw 26%, Benfica B 37%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The model expects 1.27 goals (xG) for Feirense and 1.41 for Benfica B, 2.68 in total.
Feirense or draw (1X) 63%, Benfica B or draw (X2) 64% and no draw (12) 74%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.