01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Antalyaspor or draw (1X)69%
- Under 3.5 goals74%
Turkish 1. Lig18°11 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 1–2. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Antalyaspor vs Bodrumspor (Turkish 1. Lig, Sunday, 25 October 2026): Antalyaspor win 42%, draw 31%, Bodrumspor win 27%. Expected goals (xG): Antalyaspor 1.41, Bodrumspor 1.18. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 48%, both teams to score 53%. Double chance: Antalyaspor or draw 73%, Bodrumspor or draw 58%. Prediction updated Saturday, 17 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Antalyaspor's attack has been underwhelming, with an xG of 1.2 per match that barely nudges past the league average. Yet, their knack for eking out results is evident from their 18 points, eclipsing Bodrumspor's 14. The visitors, while struggling to keep pace with the hosts in the points tally, have a stingy defense that's hard to break down. Their xG of 0.77 per match suggests a conservative style that often prioritizes containment over ambition.
In terms of expected goals from transitional play, the hosts have an edge with 0.15 xG within eight seconds of winning the ball, compared to the visitors' 0.11. Antalyaspor's ability to capitalize on brief windows of opportunity may just tip a tightly contested match in their favor. However, the most likely scorelines, such as 1-1 (13%) and 1-0 (10%), indicate a balanced affair where neither side is likely to run away with it.
The model probabilities indicate a 42% chance of a home win against 27% for Bodrumspor. The draw, sitting at 31%, reflects the tight nature of this contest. The over 2.5 goals market is finely poised at 48%, suggesting a slight lean towards a lower-scoring match. Meanwhile, the both-teams-to-score probability of 53% implies that, while goals may be in short supply, they could come from both ends.
For bettors looking for an edge, the value lies with Bodrumspor. Despite being the underdogs, their odds at 3.9 with LeoVegas and 3.87 with Betsafe and Nordicbet reflect a possible mispricing. The model rates their winning chance at 27%, offering a 5% edge over the bookmakers. While Antalyaspor might have the numerical advantage, the visitors' odds make them a tempting proposition for those willing to back an upset.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Antalyaspor | X | 2 · Bodrumspor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.76 | EV+ 7% 3.49 | EV+ 13% 4.19 |
| LeoVegas | 1.83 | EV+ 2% 3.35 | EV+ 4% 3.85 |
| Nordicbet | 1.76 | EV+ 7% 3.49 | EV+ 13% 4.19 |
Odds updated 25 Oct, 12:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Antalyaspor win since 18 October — the odds have shortened from 1.95 to 1.76 (−10%).
1.95 → 1.76
3.40 → 3.49
3.49 → 4.19
1.89 → 1.85
Betsafe · 13 recorded price levels · 18/10/2026 → 25/10/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Antalyaspor | Bodrumspor |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 18 | 14 |
| xPoints | 13.8 | 11.6 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 0.77 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.39 | 0.18 |
| Playing style | Antalyaspor | Bodrumspor |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.6 | 0.36 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| xTA per match | 0.78 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 19 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.76 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 445 | 303 |
| Passes against per match | 305 | 356 |
| Switches of play per match | 35.5 | 24.9 |
| Long balls per match | 45 | 41 |
| Set pieces | Antalyaspor | Bodrumspor |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 4.9 | 4.2 |
| Corners against per match | 2.6 | 4.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.56 |
| Other | Antalyaspor | Bodrumspor |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| The goalkeepers | Fotios Pseftis (Antalyaspor) | Diogo Fesnard Nogueira Sousa (Bodrumspor) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 16 | 32 |
| Save % | 73% | 80% |
| xG prevented | 31% | 77% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Antalyaspor a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Antalyaspor 42%, draw 31%, Bodrumspor 27%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The model expects 1.41 goals (xG) for Antalyaspor and 1.18 for Bodrumspor, 2.59 in total.
Antalyaspor or draw (1X) 73%, Bodrumspor or draw (X2) 58% and no draw (12) 69%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.