Serie BArena Garibaldi, Pisa19°8 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    PisaPisaBalanced & physical
    3–1
    CremoneseCremonesePossession & high press
    The model's lean: 2 · Cremonese (39%)

    Pisa vs Cremonese · Serie B

    1 · Pisa 32%X 29%39% Cremonese · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 3–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Pisa vs Cremonese (Serie B, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Pisa win 32%, draw 29%, Cremonese win 39%. Expected goals (xG): Pisa 1.34, Cremonese 1.34. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 50%, both teams to score 55%. Double chance: Pisa or draw 61%, Cremonese or draw 68%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Pisa – Cremonese

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    The most likely scorelines, 1-1 at 13%, and 0-1 or 1-0 each at 9%, reinforce this equilibrium.

    Full corrected text:

    The model gives Cremonese a slight edge with a 39% probability of winning against Pisa's 32%, but the numbers suggest a balanced encounter. Expected goals are deadlocked at 1.34 apiece, pointing to a tightly contested match. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 at 13%, and 0-1 or 1-0 each at 9%, reinforce this equilibrium. The over/under 2.5 goals is split at 50%, reflecting uncertainty about either side's ability to break the deadlock.

    Despite Pisa's 2-0 head-to-head advantage, the sample size of just two games is too small to outweigh more telling metrics. Pisa holds an edge in xPoints (11.7 vs 6.4), xG per match (1.9 vs 0.95), and xGA per match (1.0 vs 1.1). These factors suggest Pisa has been the more effective team in recent performances, even if the model leans slightly toward Cremonese.

    From a betting perspective, the value lies with Cremonese at odds of 3.3 with Betsafe or Nordicbet, offering a 30% edge, and at 3.25 with LeoVegas, providing a 28% edge according to the model's 39% probability. Expect a tight game with a likely 1-1 stalemate, but the away value cannot be ignored for those backing Cremonese.

    PisaPisa
    Form WWLDW
    League ranking xG #3xGA #2xT #4xP/match #1Points #7
    Key players
    • Stefano MoreoFxG 0.37 · xT 0.16
    • Mattéo TramoniLWxG 0.25 · xT 0.45
    • Francesco CoppolaCBxG 0.24 · xT 0.04
    CremoneseCremonese
    Form LWDDD
    League ranking xG #18xGA #5xT #9xP/match #18Points #14
    Key players
    • Federico BonazzoliRWxG 0.64 · xT 0.02
    • Fabio GerliCMxG 0.05 · xT 0.09
    • Simone PontissoCMxG 0.01 · xT 0.12
    Final score
    3 – 1
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Pisa 32% · Draw 29% · Cremonese 39%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - CremoneseBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 12,29fair 10,55+16 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - PisaBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 7,56fair 10,57-29 %
    Hit

    Match prediction: Pisa – Cremonese

    Predicted score matrix

    Cremonese →
    Pisa →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.2%
    0–18.8%
    0–26.2%
    0–32.8%
    0–4+1.2%
    1
    1–08.8%
    1–112.7%
    1–28.3%
    1–33.7%
    1–4+1.7%
    2
    2–06.1%
    2–18.3%
    2–25.5%
    2–32.5%
    2–4+1.1%
    3
    3–02.7%
    3–13.7%
    3–22.5%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–01.2%
    4+–11.7%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-19%
    3. 3.1-09%
    4. 4.1-28%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,34–1,34
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    @1.78
    Over 2,550%
    @2.10EV+2%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Cremonese or draw (X2)63%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    46%

    Fair odds

    2.18

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Cremonese or draw (X2)63%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Federico Bonazzoli to score29%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Federico Bonazzoli to score29%
    • Alberto Grassi to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Cremonese39% probability@3.86PinnacleEV+52%reference odds
    • 2 · Cremonese39% probability@3.45BetsafeEV+36%reference odds
    • 2 · Cremonese39% probability@3.45NordicbetEV+36%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · PisaX2 · Cremonese
    Betsafe2.083.10
    EV+ 36%
    3.45
    LeoVegas2.123.15
    EV+ 34%
    3.40
    Nordicbet2.083.10
    EV+ 36%
    3.45
    Pinnacle2.133.22
    EV+ 52%
    3.86

    Odds updated 17 Oct, 13:38

    Odds movement

    1-1 %
    47 %42 %

    2.16 → 2.13

    X+1 %
    33 %28 %

    3.20 → 3.22

    2+8 %
    28 %23 %

    3.58 → 3.86

    Over 2,50 %
    47 %42 %

    2.11 → 2.10

    Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Pisa 2Draw 0Cremonese 0
    Goals: 5–2 (⌀ 3,5)

    Head-to-head based on Serie B data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Pisa
    Cremonese
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Pisa (11–8)
    Cremonese (5–7)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Pisa
    Samuele Angori: 198 passningar, xT 0.69AngoriGiuseppe Leone: 181 passningar, xT -0.16LeoneOmar Correia: 177 passningar, xT 0.16CorreiaArturo Calabresi: 139 passningar, xT 0.1CalabresiSimone Canestrelli: 109 passningar, xT 0.05CanestrelliAlessandro Confente: 105 passningar, xT 0.07ConfenteMattéo Tramoni: 101 passningar, xT 1.67TramoniMehdi Leris: 89 passningar, xT 0.38LerisSimone Zanon: 79 passningar, xT 0.62ZanonFrancesco Coppola: 79 passningar, xT 0.06CoppolaAndrea Primasso: 73 passningar, xT 0.08Primasso
    Cremonese
    Matteo Bianchetti: 261 passningar, xT 0.56BianchettiSebastiano Luperto: 231 passningar, xT 0.45LupertoFabio Gerli: 214 passningar, xT 0.19GerliSimone Pontisso: 148 passningar, xT 0.25PontissoAlessandro Vogliacco: 132 passningar, xT 0.45VogliaccoFederico Agazzi: 118 passningar, xT 0.14AgazziTommaso Berti: 109 passningar, xT 0.26BertiFederico Baschirotto: 106 passningar, xT 0.11BaschirottoJari Vandeputte: 103 passningar, xT 0.67VandeputteYuri Rocchetti: 86 passningar, xT 0.15RocchettiFederico Bonazzoli: 76 passningar, xT -0.1Bonazzoli
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Pisa
    Samuele Angori: 198 passningar, xT 0.69AngoriGiuseppe Leone: 181 passningar, xT -0.16LeoneOmar Correia: 177 passningar, xT 0.16CorreiaArturo Calabresi: 139 passningar, xT 0.1CalabresiSimone Canestrelli: 109 passningar, xT 0.05CanestrelliAlessandro Confente: 105 passningar, xT 0.07ConfenteMattéo Tramoni: 101 passningar, xT 1.67TramoniMehdi Leris: 89 passningar, xT 0.38LerisSimone Zanon: 79 passningar, xT 0.62ZanonFrancesco Coppola: 79 passningar, xT 0.06CoppolaAndrea Primasso: 73 passningar, xT 0.08Primasso
    Cremonese
    Matteo Bianchetti: 261 passningar, xT 0.56BianchettiSebastiano Luperto: 231 passningar, xT 0.45LupertoFabio Gerli: 214 passningar, xT 0.19GerliSimone Pontisso: 148 passningar, xT 0.25PontissoAlessandro Vogliacco: 132 passningar, xT 0.45VogliaccoFederico Agazzi: 118 passningar, xT 0.14AgazziTommaso Berti: 109 passningar, xT 0.26BertiFederico Baschirotto: 106 passningar, xT 0.11BaschirottoJari Vandeputte: 103 passningar, xT 0.67VandeputteYuri Rocchetti: 86 passningar, xT 0.15RocchettiFederico Bonazzoli: 76 passningar, xT -0.1Bonazzoli

    The teams in numbers

    PerformancePisaCremonese
    Points106
    xPoints11.76.4
    xG per match1.90.95
    xGA per match11.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.220.08
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.320.27
    Playing stylePisaCremonese
    Build-up efficiency0.30.32
    Field tilt0.530.64
    xT per match1.11
    xTA per match0.980.64
    Won balls, offensive half2827
    Pressing intensity0.230.24
    Pressing efficiency0.280.28
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.240.24
    Entries into the box per match1410
    Entries into the box against148
    Pass completion %0.760.81
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.78
    Passes per match350452
    Passes against per match400359
    Switches of play per match20.630.4
    Long balls per match2233
    Set piecesPisaCremonese
    xG from free kicks0.030.02
    Corners per match6.23.7
    Corners against per match5.23.3
    xG per corner0.050.01
    xGA per corner against0.020.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.410.41
    First touch, defensive corners %0.520.55
    OtherPisaCremonese
    Throw-in control0.670.72
    The goalkeepersAlessandro Confente (Pisa)Federico Agazzi (Cremonese)
    Saves1310
    Save %62%63%
    xG prevented48%26%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Pisa vs Cremonese according to our model?

    The model gives Cremonese a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Pisa 32%, draw 29%, Cremonese 39%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Pisa vs Cremonese?

    The model expects 1.34 goals (xG) for Pisa and 1.34 for Cremonese, 2.69 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Pisa or draw (1X) 61%, Cremonese or draw (X2) 68% and no draw (12) 71%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.