01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Cremonese or draw (X2)63%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
Serie BArena Garibaldi, Pisa19°8 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 3–1. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Pisa vs Cremonese (Serie B, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Pisa win 32%, draw 29%, Cremonese win 39%. Expected goals (xG): Pisa 1.34, Cremonese 1.34. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 50%, both teams to score 55%. Double chance: Pisa or draw 61%, Cremonese or draw 68%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The most likely scorelines, 1-1 at 13%, and 0-1 or 1-0 each at 9%, reinforce this equilibrium.
Full corrected text:
The model gives Cremonese a slight edge with a 39% probability of winning against Pisa's 32%, but the numbers suggest a balanced encounter. Expected goals are deadlocked at 1.34 apiece, pointing to a tightly contested match. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 at 13%, and 0-1 or 1-0 each at 9%, reinforce this equilibrium. The over/under 2.5 goals is split at 50%, reflecting uncertainty about either side's ability to break the deadlock.
Despite Pisa's 2-0 head-to-head advantage, the sample size of just two games is too small to outweigh more telling metrics. Pisa holds an edge in xPoints (11.7 vs 6.4), xG per match (1.9 vs 0.95), and xGA per match (1.0 vs 1.1). These factors suggest Pisa has been the more effective team in recent performances, even if the model leans slightly toward Cremonese.
From a betting perspective, the value lies with Cremonese at odds of 3.3 with Betsafe or Nordicbet, offering a 30% edge, and at 3.25 with LeoVegas, providing a 28% edge according to the model's 39% probability. Expect a tight game with a likely 1-1 stalemate, but the away value cannot be ignored for those backing Cremonese.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Pisa | X | 2 · Cremonese |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.08 | 3.10 | EV+ 36% 3.45 |
| LeoVegas | 2.12 | 3.15 | EV+ 34% 3.40 |
| Nordicbet | 2.08 | 3.10 | EV+ 36% 3.45 |
| Pinnacle | 2.13 | 3.22 | EV+ 52% 3.86 |
Odds updated 17 Oct, 13:38
2.16 → 2.13
3.20 → 3.22
3.58 → 3.86
2.11 → 2.10
Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Serie B data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Pisa | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 6 |
| xPoints | 11.7 | 6.4 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 0.95 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.08 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Pisa | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.53 | 0.64 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 0.98 | 0.64 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 8 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.78 |
| Passes per match | 350 | 452 |
| Passes against per match | 400 | 359 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.6 | 30.4 |
| Long balls per match | 22 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Pisa | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 6.2 | 3.7 |
| Corners against per match | 5.2 | 3.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.55 |
| Other | Pisa | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Alessandro Confente (Pisa) | Federico Agazzi (Cremonese) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 13 | 10 |
| Save % | 62% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 48% | 26% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Cremonese a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Pisa 32%, draw 29%, Cremonese 39%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The model expects 1.34 goals (xG) for Pisa and 1.34 for Cremonese, 2.69 in total.
Pisa or draw (1X) 61%, Cremonese or draw (X2) 68% and no draw (12) 71%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Hämta bonus
Se ComeOns villkor
Hämta bonus
Se Hajpers villkor
Hämta bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.