01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Cercle Brugge to win46%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
Belgian Pro LeagueJan Breydel Stadion, Brugge8°18 km/h
Läs på svenska
Cercle BruggeLow block & directBetBuilders AI model prediction for Cercle Brugge vs Royal Antwerp (Belgian Pro League, Sunday, 1 November 2026): Cercle Brugge win 46%, draw 27%, Royal Antwerp win 26%. Expected goals (xG): Cercle Brugge 1.56, Royal Antwerp 1.22. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 53%, both teams to score 56%. Double chance: Cercle Brugge or draw 74%, Royal Antwerp or draw 54%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The 1-1 sits at 12%, the single most likely scoreline, and that tells the story better than the table does: Cercle Brugge should have enough of the ball’s dangerous moments to resist Royal Antwerp, but not necessarily enough control to turn superiority into comfort. The hosts’ low-defence, direct profile invites transitions; the visitors arrive built around counter attacks and crosses. This looks like a match decided by whether Cercle can keep those breaks from becoming clean deliveries.
The analysis points to a Cercle edge despite three straight defeats. Their 46% win probability exceeds the draw at 27% and Antwerp at 26%, while expected goals favour the hosts 1.56 to 1.22. The broader underlying numbers support that call: Cercle hold the xPoints edge, 12.9 to 9.5, create 1.4 xG per match to 1.3, and concede 1.6 xGA per match against Antwerp’s 2.1. Yet the actual points read Cercle Brugge 3 versus Royal Antwerp 10. That gap explains why this is not a confident home-banker's fixture.
Antwerp have dominated this fixture historically, with 5 wins to 1 in 8 meetings. Since 2023, the head-to-head reads 8 matches, Cercle 1W 2D 5L. That is a meaningful pattern, but it is not season form, nor does it erase the hosts’ stronger expected-goals profile. Antwerp’s route is clear: absorb, break, cross, and make Cercle’s aggressive shape pay for itself.
The model’s totals lean narrowly over 2.5 goals at 53%, with both teams to score at 56%, but the betting value lies against that marginal lean. My most likely scoreline is 1-1, with Cercle the side more likely to edge it if there is a winner. Under 2.5 at 2.36 with Betsafe or Nordicbet is assessed as EV+, with the model rating it 47% and a 12% edge; LeoVegas offer 2.35, rated a 47% chance and an 11% edge.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Cercle Brugge | X | 2 · Royal Antwerp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.92 | EV+ 4% 3.80 | 3.50 |
| LeoVegas | 1.98 | 3.65 | 3.20 |
| Nordicbet | 1.92 | EV+ 4% 3.80 | 3.50 |
Odds updated 27 Oct, 13:36
2.05 → 1.98
3.65 → 3.65
3.05 → 3.20
LeoVegas · 10 recorded price levels · 25/10/2026 → 27/10/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Cercle Brugge | Royal Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 10 |
| xPoints | 12.9 | 9.5 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.24 | 0.38 |
| Playing style | Cercle Brugge | Royal Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.39 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 0.94 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 31 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 17 |
| Pass completion % | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 291 | 325 |
| Passes against per match | 439 | 366 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.8 | 22.2 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Cercle Brugge | Royal Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 6.7 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.38 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.52 |
| Other | Cercle Brugge | Royal Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Gaëtan Coucke (Cercle Brugge) | Taishi Brandon Nozawa (Royal Antwerp) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 28 | 37 |
| Save % | 60% | 65% |
| xG prevented | 34% | 46% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Cercle Brugge spelschemaRoyal Antwerp spelschema
The model gives Cercle Brugge a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cercle Brugge 46%, draw 27%, Royal Antwerp 26%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The model expects 1.56 goals (xG) for Cercle Brugge and 1.22 for Royal Antwerp, 2.78 in total.
Cercle Brugge or draw (1X) 74%, Royal Antwerp or draw (X2) 54% and no draw (12) 73%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Get the bonus
See ComeOn's terms
Get the bonus
See Hajper's terms
Get the bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.