01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Gent to win60%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
Belgian Pro LeagueSoevereinstadion, Lommel8°9 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Lommel vs Gent (Belgian Pro League, Sunday, 1 November 2026): Lommel win 18%, draw 23%, Gent win 60%. Expected goals (xG): Lommel 0.95, Gent 1.96. Most likely score: 0-2 (10%). Over 2.5 goals 56%, both teams to score 53%. Double chance: Lommel or draw 40%, Gent or draw 82%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
0-2 is the scoreline sitting at the heart of Lommel and Gent: a controlled away win, built less on spectacle than on the visitors repeatedly forcing the hosts to defend their box. The central question is whether the home side’s counter-attacks and crosses can turn 0.95 expected goals into enough resistance. The model says no more often than not: away win 60%, draw 23%, home win 18%.
That stance has support beyond the result probabilities. The hosts have 12 points to the visitors’ 25, while expected points read 10.4 versus 16.5. More telling is the defensive gap: 1.8 xGA per match for the home side against 0.85 for Gent. The visitors’ own xG per match is only 1.3, compared with 1.1 for Lommel, but this matchup is about one defence yielding too much rather than one attack being unstoppable.
The home team’s direct approach can still matter, especially against a balanced, physical opponent. Both teams to score carries a 53% model probability, so a home goal is far from dismissed. Yet the visitors arrive on 3 straight wins and have scored in 10 consecutive league matches. Their 1.96 expected goals here is the strongest clue: they should create enough to win even if the hosts find a moment on the break. The most likely scoreline is 0-2, although Over 2.5 goals is the marginal lean at 56%; the three leading exact scores, 0-2, 1-1 and 0-1, each sit at 10%.
The cleanest betting position is the away side. LeoVegas offers 1.833, assessed as EV+ with the model’s 60% rating creating a 9% edge. Betsafe and Nordicbet each list 1.82, both assessed at an 8% edge. Back the visitors to win; the LeoVegas price is the sharpest angle.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Lommel | X | 2 · Gent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 4.20 | 3.60 | EV+ 8% 1.82 |
| LeoVegas | 3.85 | 3.50 | EV+ 9% 1.83 |
| Nordicbet | 4.20 | 3.60 | EV+ 8% 1.82 |
Odds updated 27 Oct, 13:36
3.95 → 3.85
3.65 → 3.50
1.77 → 1.83
1.73 → 1.77
LeoVegas · 8 recorded price levels · 25/10/2026 → 27/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Lommel | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 12 | 25 |
| xPoints | 10.4 | 16.5 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 0.85 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.09 | 0.18 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.25 | 0.16 |
| Playing style | Lommel | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.33 | 0.39 |
| xT per match | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 0.91 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 20 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 20 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 357 | 386 |
| Passes against per match | 436 | 467 |
| Switches of play per match | 23.2 | 37.7 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 43 |
| Set pieces | Lommel | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 3.9 | 4.1 |
| Corners against per match | 7.9 | 4.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.64 |
| Other | Lommel | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Matthias Pieklak (Lommel) | Davy Roef (Gent) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 31 | 27 |
| Save % | 76% | 87% |
| xG prevented | 72% | 62% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Lommel spelschemaGent spelschema
The model gives Gent a 60% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Lommel 18%, draw 23%, Gent 60%.
The model's most likely final score is 0-2 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The model expects 0.95 goals (xG) for Lommel and 1.96 for Gent, 2.91 in total.
Lommel or draw (1X) 40%, Gent or draw (X2) 82% and no draw (12) 77%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Get the bonus
See ComeOn's terms
Get the bonus
See Hajper's terms
Get the bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.