01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Porto to win60%
- Over 1.5 goals81%
Champions League14°7 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Porto vs Napoli (Champions League, Wednesday, 4 November 2026): Porto win 60%, draw 21%, Napoli win 19%. Expected goals (xG): Porto 1.82, Napoli 1.22. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 59%, both teams to score 59%. Double chance: Porto or draw 81%, Napoli or draw 40%. Prediction updated Tuesday, 27 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT: Porto are rated 60% to beat Napoli, and that is the central tension: Porto themselves have lost 4 in a row. The analysis still points to the hosts, but the most likely exact scoreline is 1-1 at 11%; 2-1 follows at 10%, with 1-0 at 8%. This is a home-win case built on the full score distribution, not a claim that the single most likely score settles the match.
The underlying projection gives the hosts 1.82 expected goals to the visitors’ 1.22, explaining the 60%, 21%, 19% split across home win, draw and away win. Porto’s low defence & direct profile points toward transitions rather than a match dictated by Napoli’s balanced & physical approach. The visitors have the stronger attacking season figure, 1.2 xG per match against 0.8, but that alone does not overturn the projected scoring gap.
Napoli also lead 3 points to 0 and 2.7 xPoints to 2.6. Those are season-form indicators, separate from the match model, and they complicate any easy home narrative. The hosts’ 2.2 xGA per match is better than the visitors’ 2.4, yet neither defence has offered enough protection to dismiss Porto’s losing run. Their direct play has to produce finishing, not just forward momentum.
That defensive vulnerability tilts the total upward. Over 2.5 goals is the lean at 59%, while both teams to score carries the same 59%, despite 1-1 being the modal scoreline. There is no real contradiction: the draw is the likeliest isolated result, but the wider outcome range still favours over 2.5. I lean over, though narrowly.
At LeoVegas, home at odds 2.25 is the standout EV+ assessment: the model rates it 60%, a 34% edge. Over 3.5 at odds 2.8 has a 36% model rating and a 1% edge; over 2.5 at odds 1.727 sits at 59% and a 1% edge. Back the hosts at 2.25: not a guarantee, but the sharpest price-model mismatch.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Porto | X | 2 · Napoli |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 28% 2.15 | 3.60 | 3.25 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 34% 2.25 | 3.45 | 3.10 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 28% 2.15 | 3.60 | 3.25 |
Odds updated 27 Oct, 13:37
2.18 → 2.15
3.60 → 3.60
3.15 → 3.25
1.79 → 1.79
Nordicbet · 2 recorded price levels · 27/10/2026 → 27/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Porto | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 3 |
| xPoints | 2.6 | 2.7 |
| xG per match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.07 | 0.19 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.45 | 0.31 |
| Playing style | Porto | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.2 | 0.27 |
| xT per match | 0.74 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 17 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.2 | 0.19 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.2 | 0.15 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 20 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.82 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.64 | 0.78 |
| Passes per match | 322 | 418 |
| Passes against per match | 528 | 546 |
| Switches of play per match | 13.5 | 35.1 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 36 |
| Set pieces | Porto | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 1.7 | 2.1 |
| Corners against per match | 4.4 | 5.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.2 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.54 | 0.47 |
| Other | Porto | Napoli |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| The goalkeepers | Diogo Costa (Porto) | Alex Meret (Napoli) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 14 | 7 |
| Save % | 70% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 43% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Porto spelschemaNapoli spelschema
The model gives Porto a 60% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Porto 60%, draw 21%, Napoli 19%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.
The model expects 1.82 goals (xG) for Porto and 1.22 for Napoli, 3.04 in total.
Porto or draw (1X) 81%, Napoli or draw (X2) 40% and no draw (12) 79%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Get the bonus
See ComeOn's terms
Get the bonus
See Hajper's terms
Get the bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.