Lens vs Como Prediction: Away win 39% (4 Nov 2026)

Champions League4 November 202610°10 km/h

Läs på svenska

LensBalanced & physical

ComoBalanced & physical

The model's lean: 2 · Como (39%)Soft drawBest value by the model: 1 · Lens @ 3.05 (+9 %)

1 · Lens 36%X 26%39% Como · 2

36%

26%

39%

Prediction summary

BetBuilders AI model prediction for Lens vs Como (Champions League, Wednesday, 4 November 2026): Lens win 36%, draw 26%, Como win 39%. Expected goals (xG): Lens 1.51, Como 1.67. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 62%, both teams to score 63%. Double chance: Lens or draw 61%, Como or draw 64%. Prediction updated Tuesday, 27 October 2026.

Bet on this match

NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet

BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe

LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

Analysis: Lens – Como

Anna Karlsson · 27 October 2026 · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

Como have the stronger case in Lens vs Como, but the match turns on whether their defensive control can survive the hosts’ heavier attacking output. The model gives the visitors a 39% win probability, ahead of 36% for the home side and 26% for the draw. That is a real Como lean, though hardly a runaway call.

Lens create 1.8 xG per match against Como’s 1.4. That is the home side’s route into this game: make their physical, balanced profile count in the final third before the visitors settle the tempo. But the defensive figures pull the argument sharply back toward Como. The hosts allow 2.2 xGA per match; the visitors allow only 0.8.

Six points versus three also favours the Italians, and the xPoints gap is even more telling: 5.6 to 2.7. Those numbers suggest Como have earned their advantage rather than stumbled into it. Lens have enough attacking production to threaten, but their defensive exposure is the decisive flaw. A side conceding 2.2 xGA per match is asking its forwards to be nearly perfect.

The single most likely scoreline is 1-1 at 11%, with 1-2 next at 9% and 2-1 at 8%. My match call is therefore a narrow Como edge, while 1-1 is the likeliest exact score. The goals angle is clearer: Over 2.5 goals sits at 62%, and both teams to score at 63%. The analysis leans Over 2.5, even if the most concentrated individual scoreline lands below it.

There is a separate price argument on the home side. Lens at 3.0 with LeoVegas is rated EV+ by the model: its 36% win chance implies a 7% edge. That is an assessment rather than a guarantee, and it runs against the overall Como lean, but the sharpest betting angle is still Lens to win at 3.0 with LeoVegas.

Lens

Form WLL

League ranking xG #19xGA #44xT #4xP/match #46Points #35

Key players

Florian Tristán Mariano ThauvinFxG 0.41 · xT 0.61
Matthieu UdolLBxG 0.19 · xT 0.20
Amadou HaidaraCMxG 0.18 · xT 0.01

Como

Form WLW

League ranking xG #30xGA #2xT #39xP/match #11Points #19

Key players

Nico PazRWxG 0.31 · xT 0.13
Alex ValleLBxG 0.00 · xT 0.16
Jacobo RamonCBxG 0.13 · xT 0.11

Match prediction: Lens – Como

Predicted score matrix

Como →

Lens →

0–04.5%

0–16.7%

0–25.8%

0–33.2%

0–4+2.0%

1–06.0%

1–110.8%

1–28.8%

1–34.9%

1–4+3.0%

2–04.7%

2–17.9%

2–26.6%

2–33.7%

2–4+2.2%

3–02.4%

3–14.0%

3–23.3%

3–31.8%

3–4+1.1%

4+–01.3%

4+–12.1%

4+–21.7%

4+–31.0%

4+–4+0.6%

Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

Most likely scorelines

1.1-111%
2.1-29%
3.2-18%
4.0-17%
5.2-27%

Expected goals

1,51–1,67

Both teams to score

63%

Over/under goals

Expected goals: 3,2

113%

221%

322%

418%

5+22%

Under 2,538%

@2.54

Over 2,562%

@1.53

Ready-made bet suggestions

More combos & build your own →

01 · 2 legs

Safe

Double chance Como or draw (X2)66%
Over 1.5 goals83%

02 · 3 legs

Balanced

Double chance Como or draw (X2)66%
Over 2.5 goals62%
Anastasios Douvikas to score28%

03 · 4 legs

Bold

Both teams to score63%
Over 2.5 goals62%
Anastasios Douvikas to score28%
Andrija Bulatovic to be booked20%

Odds & value

The model's value spots

Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

1 · Lens36% probability@3.05BetsafeEV+9%reference odds
1 · Lens36% probability@3.05NordicbetEV+9%reference odds
1 · Lens36% probability@3.00LeoVegasEV+7%reference odds

Bookmaker	1 · Lens	X	2 · Como
Betsafe	EV+ 9% 3.05	3.75	2.18
LeoVegas	EV+ 7% 3.00	3.80	2.15
Nordicbet	EV+ 9% 3.05	3.75	2.18

Odds updated 27 Oct, 13:37

Odds movement

10 %

34 %29 %

3.05 → 3.05

X0 %

28 %23 %

3.75 → 3.75

20 %

46 %41 %

2.18 → 2.18

Over 2,50 %

65 %60 %

1.53 → 1.53

Nordicbet · 3 recorded price levels · 27/10/2026 → 27/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

Statistics

xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

Lens

Como

When goals are scored and conceded — 2026

Lens (3–7)

Como (10–5)

Pass networks

Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

Lens

Como

xT networks

The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

Lens

Como

The teams in numbers

Performance	Lens	Como
Points	3	6
xPoints	2.7	5.6
xG per match	1.8	1.4
xGA per match	2.2	0.8
xG within 8s of winning the ball	0.11	0.19
xGA within 8s of losing the ball	0.33	0.09

Playing style	Lens	Como
Build-up efficiency	0.29	0.3
Field tilt	0.63	0.5
xT per match	1.8	0.79
xTA per match	0.95	1
Won balls, offensive half	30	25
Pressing intensity	0.22	0.23
Pressing efficiency	0.25	0.23
Pressing efficiency, offensive half	0.21	0.19
Entries into the box per match	19	10
Entries into the box against	10	10
Pass completion %	0.79	0.85
Pass completion % under pressure	0.75	0.81
Passes per match	445	531
Passes against per match	396	464
Switches of play per match	23.9	15.7
Long balls per match	27	18

Set pieces	Lens	Como
xG from free kicks	0.16	0.05
Corners per match	6.8	1
Corners against per match	3.4	4.5
xG per corner	0.04	0.05
xGA per corner against	0.02	0.01
First touch, offensive corners %	0.4	0.67
First touch, defensive corners %	0.6	0.85

Other	Lens	Como
Throw-in control	0.73	0.6

The goalkeepers	Robin Risser (Lens)	Jean Butez (Como)
Saves	8	6
Save %	53%	75%
xG prevented	27%	56%
Claims	0 (0%)	0 (0%)

Teams & more matches this round

Lens

Fixtures, form & tips

Como

Fixtures, form & tips

Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Lens spelschema Como spelschema

Frequently asked questions

Who wins Lens vs Como according to our model?

The model gives Como a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Lens 36%, draw 26%, Como 39%.

What is the most likely scoreline?

The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

Over or under 2.5 goals?

The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.

Will both teams score?

The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.

How many goals are expected in Lens vs Como?

The model expects 1.51 goals (xG) for Lens and 1.67 for Como, 3.18 in total.

What does the model say about double chance?

Lens or draw (1X) 61%, Como or draw (X2) 64% and no draw (12) 74%.

Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.