01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Wolverhampton to win46%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
EFL ChampionshipAshton Gate, Bristol8°10 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Bristol City vs Wolverhampton (EFL Championship, Wednesday, 4 November 2026): Bristol City win 27%, draw 27%, Wolverhampton win 46%. Expected goals (xG): Bristol City 1.00, Wolverhampton 1.43. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 44%, both teams to score 48%. Double chance: Bristol City or draw 54%, Wolverhampton or draw 73%. Prediction updated Tuesday, 27 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
46% for Wolverhampton is the number that matters, even if 1-1 is the model’s most likely exact scoreline at 13%. Bristol City sit on 15 points to the visitors’ 21, and the underlying gap is similar: 16.5 xPoints versus 21.1. The analysis points to Wolves being the right side, not a runaway favourite.
The hosts’ low-defence, direct profile can make this awkward, but their 1.00 expected goals trails Wolverhampton’s 1.43. Wolves also create more per match, 1.7 xG to 1.2, while allowing markedly less: 0.94 xGA against 1.3. Possession control should limit Bristol City’s cleaner breaks.
Under 2.5 goals is the stronger totals lean at 56%, with both teams to score only 48%. The likeliest scoreline is 1-1, but 0-1 at 12% fits the wider evidence better: Wolverhampton to win in a low-scoring match is the sharp angle.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Bristol City | Wolverhampton |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 15 | 21 |
| xPoints | 16.5 | 21.1 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 0.94 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.24 | 0.28 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| Playing style | Bristol City | Wolverhampton |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.45 | 0.53 |
| xT per match | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1 | 0.75 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 277 | 393 |
| Passes against per match | 349 | 307 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.6 | 31.9 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Bristol City | Wolverhampton |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.11 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Corners against per match | 5.3 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.3 | 0.39 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.7 | 0.57 |
| Other | Bristol City | Wolverhampton |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| The goalkeepers | Samuel Lloyd Tickle (Bristol City) | José Sá (Wolverhampton) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 17 | 25 |
| Save % | 55% | 66% |
| xG prevented | 28% | 39% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Bristol City spelschemaWolverhampton spelschema
The model gives Wolverhampton a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Bristol City 27%, draw 27%, Wolverhampton 46%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.
The model expects 1.00 goals (xG) for Bristol City and 1.43 for Wolverhampton, 2.42 in total.
Bristol City or draw (1X) 54%, Wolverhampton or draw (X2) 73% and no draw (12) 73%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Get the bonus
See ComeOn's terms
Get the bonus
See Hajper's terms
Get the bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.