EFL League OneAdams Park, High Wycombe9°21 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Wycombe WanderersWycombe WanderersPossession control
    2–0
    Notts CountyNotts CountyPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Wycombe Wanderers (46%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.03 (+11 %)

    Wycombe Wanderers vs Notts County · EFL League One

    1 · Wycombe Wanderers 46%X 29%26% Notts County · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 2–0. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Wycombe Wanderers vs Notts County (EFL League One, Saturday, 17 October 2026): Wycombe Wanderers win 46%, draw 29%, Notts County win 26%. Expected goals (xG): Wycombe Wanderers 1.50, Notts County 0.99. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 45%, both teams to score 49%. Double chance: Wycombe Wanderers or draw 74%, Notts County or draw 54%. Prediction updated Friday, 9 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Wycombe Wanderers – Notts County

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Wycombe Wanderers have been on a scoring spree, finding the back of the net in every one of their last 11 league appearances. Their ability to maintain such an offensive drive will be tested against Notts County, who have been struggling to halt a worrying three-match losing streak. The head-to-head record between these two isn't extensive enough to heavily influence our expectations, so the focus remains on current form and statistical models.

    The statistics suggest a competitive matchup, but the hosts have a slight edge. Wycombe's ability to generate 1.5 expected goals per match, compared to County's 1.0, hints at a more potent attack. However, defensively, the tables turn: the hosts allow 1.7 xGA per game while the visitors are tighter at the back with 1.2 xGA. This contradiction could lead to a tightly contested battle, possibly leaning towards a narrow victory for the home side.

    With the model's lean towards Wycombe and the most likely scoreline being a cautious 1-1 (13%), or a 1-0 win for Wycombe (12%), the overall expectation is for a match that doesn't explode into a high-scoring affair. The model suggests a 45% chance for over 2.5 goals, leaning towards the under, reinforced by both teams' possession-based approaches, which could lead to cautious play focusing on control rather than relentless attacking.

    For those seeking value, the under 2.5 goals market presents an intriguing opportunity. Betsafe offers odds of 1.98, with the model assessing a 55% likelihood, translating to an 8% edge. This bet stands out as the sharp angle in a match where defensive strategies might just outshine attacking ambitions.

    Wycombe WanderersWycombe Wanderers
    Form DWWDL
    League ranking xG #11xGA #19xT #8xP/match #17Points #15
    Key players
    • Ewan HendersonCMxG 0.08 · xT 0.21
    • Jayden WarehamFxG 0.50 · xT 0.00
    • Daniel HarvieLBxG 0.17 · xT 0.19
    Notts CountyNotts County
    Form DDLLL
    League ranking xG #20xGA #8xT #23xP/match #11Points #22
    Key players
    • Callum RobertsFxG 0.16 · xT 0.12
    • Lucas NessCBxG 0.06 · xT 0.04
    • James Andrew GibbonsCBxG 0.04 · xT 0.06
    Final score
    2 – 0
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Wycombe Wanderers 46% · Draw 29% · Notts County 26%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - WycombeBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 6,10fair 9,14-33 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - Notts CountyBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 12,30fair 20,71-41 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Wycombe Wanderers – Notts County

    Predicted score matrix

    Notts County →
    Wycombe Wanderers →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.6%
    0–17.8%
    0–24.1%
    0–31.3%
    0–4+0.4%
    1
    1–012.1%
    1–112.7%
    1–26.1%
    1–32.0%
    1–4+0.6%
    2
    2–09.3%
    2–19.2%
    2–24.6%
    2–31.5%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–04.7%
    3–14.6%
    3–22.3%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–02.4%
    4+–12.4%
    4+–21.2%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.2-09%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-09%
    Expected goals
    1,50–0,99
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,555%
    @2.03EV+8%
    Over 2,545%
    @1.83

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Wycombe Wanderers to win46%
    • Under 3.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    35%

    Fair odds

    2.83

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Wycombe Wanderers to win46%
    • Under 2.5 goals55%
    • Luke Leahy to score32%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals45%
    • Luke Leahy to score32%
    • Scott Alexander Cameron Robertson to be booked24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.555% probability@2.03PinnacleEV+11%reference odds
    • Under 2.555% probability@1.98BetsafeEV+8%reference odds
    • Under 2.555% probability@1.98NordicbetEV+8%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Wycombe WanderersX2 · Notts County
    Betsafe1.88
    EV+ 3%
    3.60
    3.70
    LeoVegas1.953.503.60
    Nordicbet1.88
    EV+ 3%
    3.60
    3.70
    Pinnacle1.94
    EV+ 5%
    3.67
    EV+ 0%
    3.86

    Odds updated 17 Oct, 12:16

    Odds movement

    10 %
    51 %46 %

    1.93 → 1.94

    X+3 %
    29 %24 %

    3.57 → 3.67

    2+2 %
    27 %22 %

    3.77 → 3.86

    Over 2,50 %
    55 %50 %

    1.83 → 1.83

    Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 15/10/2026 → 17/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Wycombe Wanderers have scored in 11 consecutive league matches.
    • Notts County have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Wycombe Wanderers
    Notts County
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Wycombe Wanderers (14–20)
    Notts County (8–11)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Wycombe Wanderers
    Connor Taylor: 191 passningar, xT 0.24TaylorDan Casey: 180 passningar, xT 0.23CaseySteve Anthony Cook: 155 passningar, xT 0.3CookEwan Henderson: 133 passningar, xT 1.15HendersonDaniel Harvie: 118 passningar, xT 0.74HarvieAaron Morley: 115 passningar, xT 0.45MorleyConor William Hazard: 106 passningar, xT 0.11HazardFred Onyedinma: 97 passningar, xT 1.05OnyedinmaJosh Scowen: 93 passningar, xT 0.62ScowenCaolan Stephen Boyd-Munce: 93 passningar, xT 0.35Boyd-MunceJack Grimmer: 71 passningar, xT 0.26Grimmer
    Notts County
    Lucas Ness: 180 passningar, xT 0.13NessJacob Bedeau: 162 passningar, xT 0.2BedeauJames Andrew Gibbons: 151 passningar, xT 0.24GibbonsNick Tsaroulla: 133 passningar, xT 0.33TsaroullaRory Finneran: 119 passningar, xT 0.03FinneranJames Belshaw: 100 passningar, xT 0.14BelshawOliver Joseph Cooper: 75 passningar, xT -0.04CooperConor Grant: 58 passningar, xT -0.03GrantDarius Lipsiuc: 54 passningar, xT 0.05LipsiucJack Lucas James Evans: 48 passningar, xT 0.03EvansMatt Palmer: 46 passningar, xT 0Palmer
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Wycombe Wanderers
    Connor Taylor: 191 passningar, xT 0.24TaylorDan Casey: 180 passningar, xT 0.23CaseySteve Anthony Cook: 155 passningar, xT 0.3CookEwan Henderson: 133 passningar, xT 1.15HendersonDaniel Harvie: 118 passningar, xT 0.74HarvieAaron Morley: 115 passningar, xT 0.45MorleyConor William Hazard: 106 passningar, xT 0.11HazardFred Onyedinma: 97 passningar, xT 1.05OnyedinmaJosh Scowen: 93 passningar, xT 0.62ScowenCaolan Stephen Boyd-Munce: 93 passningar, xT 0.35Boyd-MunceJack Grimmer: 71 passningar, xT 0.26Grimmer
    Notts County
    Lucas Ness: 180 passningar, xT 0.13NessJacob Bedeau: 162 passningar, xT 0.2BedeauJames Andrew Gibbons: 151 passningar, xT 0.24GibbonsNick Tsaroulla: 133 passningar, xT 0.33TsaroullaRory Finneran: 119 passningar, xT 0.03FinneranJames Belshaw: 100 passningar, xT 0.14BelshawOliver Joseph Cooper: 75 passningar, xT -0.04CooperConor Grant: 58 passningar, xT -0.03GrantDarius Lipsiuc: 54 passningar, xT 0.05LipsiucJack Lucas James Evans: 48 passningar, xT 0.03EvansMatt Palmer: 46 passningar, xT 0Palmer

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceWycombe WanderersNotts County
    Points107
    xPoints11.111.2
    xG per match1.51
    xGA per match1.71.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.180.11
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.270.22
    Playing styleWycombe WanderersNotts County
    Build-up efficiency0.320.31
    Field tilt0.480.44
    xT per match1.10.68
    xTA per match0.960.91
    Won balls, offensive half2326
    Pressing intensity0.220.22
    Pressing efficiency0.320.34
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.290.3
    Entries into the box per match1410
    Entries into the box against1212
    Pass completion %0.710.69
    Pass completion % under pressure0.650.67
    Passes per match312274
    Passes against per match320341
    Switches of play per match22.712.8
    Long balls per match3422
    Set piecesWycombe WanderersNotts County
    xG from free kicks0.190.05
    Corners per match5.34.5
    Corners against per match5.54.8
    xG per corner0.070.04
    xGA per corner against0.030.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.40.44
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.77
    OtherWycombe WanderersNotts County
    Throw-in control0.710.73
    The goalkeepersConor William Hazard (Wycombe Wanderers)James Belshaw (Notts County)
    Saves2518
    Save %60%64%
    xG prevented32%48%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Wycombe Wanderers spelschemaNotts County spelschema

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Wycombe Wanderers vs Notts County according to our model?

    The model gives Wycombe Wanderers a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Wycombe Wanderers 46%, draw 29%, Notts County 26%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 45% and under at 55%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Wycombe Wanderers vs Notts County?

    The model expects 1.50 goals (xG) for Wycombe Wanderers and 0.99 for Notts County, 2.49 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Wycombe Wanderers or draw (1X) 74%, Notts County or draw (X2) 54% and no draw (12) 71%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.