Norwegian Eliteserien11°15,5 mm12 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    VikingVikingPossession & high press
    vs
    KFUMKFUMLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Viking (78%)

    Viking vs KFUM · Norwegian Eliteserien

    1 · Viking 78%X 13%9% KFUM · 2

    Prediction summary

    BetBuilders AI model prediction for Viking vs KFUM (Norwegian Eliteserien, Saturday, 31 October 2026): Viking win 78%, draw 13%, KFUM win 9%. Expected goals (xG): Viking 2.64, KFUM 0.97. Most likely score: 2-0 (9%). Over 2.5 goals 70%, both teams to score 58%. Double chance: Viking or draw 91%, KFUM or draw 22%. Prediction updated Friday, 23 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Viking – KFUM

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Four wins to none in five meetings since 2021 give Viking the historical edge over KFUM: 4W, 1D, 0L. Still, five matches is a small head-to-head sample and carries less weight than current form and expected-goals data. The pattern matters only because it aligns with the wider picture: the hosts have repeatedly found ways to control this matchup.

    The season numbers are harsher still. Viking hold 59 points to the visitors’ 30, while xPoints read 41.8 against 28.7. Their 2.3 xG per match dwarfs KFUM’s 1.2, and the defensive split is equally clear at 1.3 xGA versus 1.9. Five straight wins and goals in 13 consecutive league matches reinforce that production. KFUM arrive unbeaten in their last 5 league matches, but that run belongs to their recent form, not the head-to-head record, and it does not erase the underlying gap.

    This is a bad stylistic fit for the visitors. Viking’s possession game and high press should pin a low-defence, direct opponent into long spells without the ball. The model gives the hosts a 78% win probability, against 13% for the draw and 9% for KFUM. Expected goals sit at 2.64 to 0.97. That is not a narrow home-edge profile; it is a game tilted toward sustained Viking pressure, with the visitors needing efficiency rather than control.

    My score call is 2-0, one of the joint-most-likely exact scores at 9%, alongside 2-1 at 9%; 3-0 follows at 8%. The underdog’s direct threat keeps both teams to score live at 58%, but the stronger total-goals signal is Over 2.5 at 70%. Viking are the clear result side, yet Over 2.5 goals is the sharper betting angle.

    VikingViking
    Form WWWWW
    League ranking xG #2xGA #3xT #3xP/match #2Points #1
    Key players
    • Henrik HeggheimRBxG 0.16 · xT 0.15
    • Gianni StensnessCBxG 0.23 · xT 0.09
    • Henrik FalchenerCBxG 0.10 · xT 0.05
    KFUMKFUM
    Form WWWDD
    League ranking xG #16xGA #11xT #14xP/match #12Points #8
    Key players
    • Bilal NjieLWxG 0.31 · xT 0.10
    • Daniel SchneiderCBxG 0.03 · xT 0.08
    • Robin RaschCDMxG 0.12 · xT 0.15

    Match prediction: Viking – KFUM

    Predicted score matrix

    KFUM →
    Viking →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–02.9%
    0–12.4%
    0–21.3%
    0–30.4%
    0–4+0.1%
    1
    1–07.0%
    1–17.1%
    1–23.4%
    1–31.1%
    1–4+0.3%
    2
    2–09.5%
    2–19.2%
    2–24.4%
    2–31.4%
    2–4+0.4%
    3
    3–08.3%
    3–18.0%
    3–23.9%
    3–31.3%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–010.3%
    4+–110.0%
    4+–24.8%
    4+–31.6%
    4+–4+0.5%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.2-09%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.3-08%
    4. 4.3-18%
    5. 5.1-17%
    Expected goals
    2,64–0,97
    Both teams to score
    58%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,6
    Under 2,530%
    –
    Over 2,570%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Viking to win78%
    • Over 1.5 goals88%

    Combined probability

    66%

    Fair odds

    1.52

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Viking to win78%
    • Over 2.5 goals70%
    • Peter Buch Christiansen to score31%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score58%
    • Over 2.5 goals70%
    • Peter Buch Christiansen to score31%
    • Robin Gravli Rasch to be booked24%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    No odds available yet.

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    5 matches
    Viking 4Draw 1KFUM 0
    Goals: 10–4 (⌀ 2,8)

    Head-to-head based on Eliteserien data since 2021.

    Key facts

    • Viking FK dominate this fixture historically: 4 wins to 0 in 5 meetings.
    • Viking FK come into this round on 5 straight wins.
    • Viking FK have scored in 13 consecutive league matches.
    • KFUM are unbeaten in their last 5 league matches.
    • Viking FK win 67% of their home matches all-time (87 played).
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Viking
    KFUM
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Viking (62–23)
    KFUM (30–39)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Viking
    Henrik Falchener: 199 passningar, xT 0.16FalchenerGianni Stensness: 176 passningar, xT 0.37StensnessHenrik Heggheim: 170 passningar, xT 0.68HeggheimZlatko Tripic: 135 passningar, xT 1.71TripicHenrik Bjordal: 135 passningar, xT 1.06BjordalJoe Bell: 134 passningar, xT 0.04BellArild Ostbo: 131 passningar, xT 0.21OstboKristoffer Haugen: 130 passningar, xT 0.84HaugenTobias Moi: 85 passningar, xT 0.04MoiKristoffer Askildsen: 73 passningar, xT 0.09AskildsenSimen Kvia Egeskog: 59 passningar, xT 0.25Egeskog
    KFUM
    Fredrik Tobias Berglie: 209 passningar, xT 0.18BerglieBrage Skaret: 189 passningar, xT 0.35SkaretJonas Lange Hjorth: 153 passningar, xT 0.74HjorthEirik Saunes: 145 passningar, xT 0.45SaunesDaniel Schneider: 133 passningar, xT 0.09SchneiderEmil Ødegaard: 130 passningar, xT 0.28ØdegaardHakon Helland Hoseth: 122 passningar, xT 0.31HosethMartin Tangen Vinjor: 102 passningar, xT 0.08VinjorOla Visted: 91 passningar, xT 0.2VistedBilal Njie: 74 passningar, xT 0.66NjieHåkon Røsten: 67 passningar, xT 0.13Røsten
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Viking
    Henrik Falchener: 199 passningar, xT 0.16FalchenerGianni Stensness: 176 passningar, xT 0.37StensnessHenrik Heggheim: 170 passningar, xT 0.68HeggheimZlatko Tripic: 135 passningar, xT 1.71TripicHenrik Bjordal: 135 passningar, xT 1.06BjordalJoe Bell: 134 passningar, xT 0.04BellArild Ostbo: 131 passningar, xT 0.21OstboKristoffer Haugen: 130 passningar, xT 0.84HaugenTobias Moi: 85 passningar, xT 0.04MoiKristoffer Askildsen: 73 passningar, xT 0.09AskildsenSimen Kvia Egeskog: 59 passningar, xT 0.25Egeskog
    KFUM
    Fredrik Tobias Berglie: 209 passningar, xT 0.18BerglieBrage Skaret: 189 passningar, xT 0.35SkaretJonas Lange Hjorth: 153 passningar, xT 0.74HjorthEirik Saunes: 145 passningar, xT 0.45SaunesDaniel Schneider: 133 passningar, xT 0.09SchneiderEmil Ødegaard: 130 passningar, xT 0.28ØdegaardHakon Helland Hoseth: 122 passningar, xT 0.31HosethMartin Tangen Vinjor: 102 passningar, xT 0.08VinjorOla Visted: 91 passningar, xT 0.2VistedBilal Njie: 74 passningar, xT 0.66NjieHåkon Røsten: 67 passningar, xT 0.13Røsten

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceVikingKFUM
    Points5930
    xPoints41.828.7
    xG per match2.31.2
    xGA per match1.31.9
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.510.21
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.250.26
    Playing styleVikingKFUM
    Build-up efficiency0.340.35
    Field tilt0.550.4
    xT per match1.60.9
    xTA per match1.11.3
    Won balls, offensive half2923
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.280.27
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.240.25
    Entries into the box per match1712
    Entries into the box against1318
    Pass completion %0.750.73
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.7
    Passes per match364327
    Passes against per match384441
    Switches of play per match26.919.1
    Long balls per match3628
    Set piecesVikingKFUM
    xG from free kicks0.070.03
    Corners per match6.74
    Corners against per match5.55.5
    xG per corner0.040.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.370.34
    First touch, defensive corners %0.560.52
    OtherVikingKFUM
    Throw-in control0.730.73
    The goalkeepersArild Ostbo (Viking)Emil Ødegaard (KFUM)
    Saves3949
    Save %78%74%
    xG prevented78%58%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Viking spelschemaKFUM spelschema

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Viking vs KFUM according to our model?

    The model gives Viking a 78% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Viking 78%, draw 13%, KFUM 9%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 9% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 70% and under at 30%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Viking vs KFUM?

    The model expects 2.64 goals (xG) for Viking and 0.97 for KFUM, 3.61 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Viking or draw (1X) 91%, KFUM or draw (X2) 22% and no draw (12) 87%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.