Swedish AllsvenskanGamla Ullevi, Göteborg9°23 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    GAISGAISPossession & high press
    vs
    AIKAIKPossession & high press
    The model's lean: 1 · GAIS (53%)

    GAIS vs AIK · Swedish Allsvenskan

    1 · GAIS 53%X 24%23% AIK · 2

    Prediction summary

    BetBuilders AI model prediction for GAIS vs AIK (Swedish Allsvenskan, Monday, 2 November 2026): GAIS win 53%, draw 24%, AIK win 23%. Expected goals (xG): GAIS 1.83, AIK 1.21. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 58%, both teams to score 59%. Double chance: GAIS or draw 77%, AIK or draw 47%. Prediction updated Monday, 26 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: GAIS – AIK

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    TEXT: GAIS and AIK have faced off five times since 2023, splitting their encounters evenly with two wins apiece and a draw. While this head-to-head record gives little away, a closer look at the underlying numbers paints a different picture. The model heavily favors the hosts, with a 53% probability of victory, contrasting starkly with AIK's 23%. Such confidence in Gais doesn’t stem from current standings, where the visitors hold a slender points advantage, but from their superior expected performance metrics.

    Gais's underlying numbers are compelling. Their expected goals per match (1.6) and a solid expected goals against (1.2) suggest a team that not only creates but also suppresses chances effectively. Meanwhile, AIK’s xGA of 1.8 per game exposes defensive vulnerabilities, a factor that could tilt the balance against a possession and high press style similar to Gais's. It’s this disparity in expected defensive solidity that supports the forecast of a home win.

    In terms of the scoreline, the most likely outcomes hover around a tight contest with a slight edge to the hosts, notably 1-1 and 2-1. Such predictions align with the expected goals tally favoring Gais, who are projected to net 1.83 times versus AIK's 1.21. The 58% likelihood of over 2.5 goals and 59% chance of both teams scoring hint at a match where defensive frailties could be exposed despite both teams' strategic setups.

    The sharpest angle here is the market underestimating Gais’s potential. The xPoints discrepancy underscores this, suggesting that the hosts, buoyed by their statistical edge, are poised to translate their expected dominance into three points.

    GAISGAIS
    Form LWLLD
    League ranking xG #4xGA #5xT #2xP/match #5Points #11
    Key players
    • August WängbergRBxG 0.02 · xT 0.17
    • Filip BeckmanCBxG 0.13 · xT 0.08
    • Robin FrejCBxG 0.04 · xT 0.19
    AIKAIK
    Form DLLDW
    League ranking xG #8xGA #14xT #11xP/match #12Points #8
    Key players
    • Sotirios PapagiannopoulosCBxG 0.01 · xT 0.06
    • Taha AyariFxG 0.30 · xT 0.09
    • Linus CarlstrandFxG 0.47 · xT 0.07

    Match prediction: GAIS – AIK

    Predicted score matrix

    AIK →
    GAIS →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.1%
    0–15.5%
    0–23.5%
    0–31.4%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–08.5%
    1–110.9%
    1–26.4%
    1–32.6%
    1–4+1.0%
    2
    2–08.0%
    2–19.7%
    2–25.8%
    2–32.3%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–04.9%
    3–15.9%
    3–23.6%
    3–31.4%
    3–4+0.6%
    4+
    4+–03.4%
    4+–14.1%
    4+–22.5%
    4+–31.0%
    4+–4+0.4%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.2-110%
    3. 3.1-08%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.1-26%
    Expected goals
    1,83–1,21
    Both teams to score
    59%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,0
    Under 2,542%
    –
    Over 2,558%
    –

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • GAIS to win53%
    • Over 1.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    43%

    Fair odds

    2.32

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • GAIS to win53%
    • Over 2.5 goals58%
    • Rasmus Niklasson Petrovic to score31%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score59%
    • Over 2.5 goals58%
    • Rasmus Niklasson Petrovic to score31%
    • Yannick Geiger to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    Bookmaker1 · GAISX2 · AIK
    LeoVegas1.803.854.00

    Odds updated 26 Oct, 19:36

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    5 matches
    GAIS 2Draw 1AIK 2
    Goals: 4–4 (⌀ 1,6)

    Head-to-head based on Allsvenskan data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    GAIS
    AIK
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    GAIS (31–26)
    AIK (40–43)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    GAIS
    Robin Frej: 244 passningar, xT 0.54FrejJoackim Fagerjord: 243 passningar, xT 0.22FagerjordOskar Ågren: 239 passningar, xT 0.32ÅgrenFilip Beckman: 172 passningar, xT 0.17BeckmanMatteo De Brienne: 156 passningar, xT 0.66BrienneAugust Wängberg: 151 passningar, xT 0.74WängbergHenry Sletsjøe: 129 passningar, xT 0.1SletsjøeRobin Wendin Thomasson: 126 passningar, xT 0.86ThomassonAnes Cardaklija: 102 passningar, xT 0.09CardaklijaWilliam Milovanovic: 90 passningar, xT 1.19MilovanovicMergim Krasniqi: 67 passningar, xT 0.17Krasniqi
    AIK
    Hervé Matthys: 324 passningar, xT 0.35MatthysAbdihakin Ali: 297 passningar, xT 0.93AliEskil Edh: 294 passningar, xT 0.21EdhWilmer Olofsson: 220 passningar, xT 0.45OlofssonMads Døhr Thychosen: 209 passningar, xT 0.81ThychosenYannick Geiger: 202 passningar, xT 0.02GeigerSebastian Hausner: 178 passningar, xT 0.16HausnerAxel Kouame: 162 passningar, xT 0.68KouameKristoffer Nordfeldt: 160 passningar, xT 0.03NordfeldtJohan Hove: 152 passningar, xT 1.28HoveDiogo Alberto Soares Tomas: 134 passningar, xT 0.21Tomas
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    GAIS
    Robin Frej: 244 passningar, xT 0.54FrejJoackim Fagerjord: 243 passningar, xT 0.22FagerjordOskar Ågren: 239 passningar, xT 0.32ÅgrenFilip Beckman: 172 passningar, xT 0.17BeckmanMatteo De Brienne: 156 passningar, xT 0.66BrienneAugust Wängberg: 151 passningar, xT 0.74WängbergHenry Sletsjøe: 129 passningar, xT 0.1SletsjøeRobin Wendin Thomasson: 126 passningar, xT 0.86ThomassonAnes Cardaklija: 102 passningar, xT 0.09CardaklijaWilliam Milovanovic: 90 passningar, xT 1.19MilovanovicMergim Krasniqi: 67 passningar, xT 0.17Krasniqi
    AIK
    Hervé Matthys: 324 passningar, xT 0.35MatthysAbdihakin Ali: 297 passningar, xT 0.93AliEskil Edh: 294 passningar, xT 0.21EdhWilmer Olofsson: 220 passningar, xT 0.45OlofssonMads Døhr Thychosen: 209 passningar, xT 0.81ThychosenYannick Geiger: 202 passningar, xT 0.02GeigerSebastian Hausner: 178 passningar, xT 0.16HausnerAxel Kouame: 162 passningar, xT 0.68KouameKristoffer Nordfeldt: 160 passningar, xT 0.03NordfeldtJohan Hove: 152 passningar, xT 1.28HoveDiogo Alberto Soares Tomas: 134 passningar, xT 0.21Tomas

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceGAISAIK
    Points3137
    xPoints39.127.2
    xG per match1.61.4
    xGA per match1.21.8
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.420.18
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.140.33
    Playing styleGAISAIK
    Build-up efficiency0.330.34
    Field tilt0.550.52
    xT per match1.61.4
    xTA per match1.31.4
    Won balls, offensive half3828
    Pressing intensity0.510.55
    Pressing efficiency0.250.23
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.250.23
    Entries into the box per match1713
    Entries into the box against1215
    Pass completion %0.80.83
    Pass completion % under pressure0.760.78
    Passes per match417427
    Passes against per match400356
    Switches of play per match12.714.6
    Long balls per match2735
    Set piecesGAISAIK
    xG from free kicks0.160.16
    Corners per match5.35
    Corners against per match4.65.1
    xG per corner0.030.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.410.33
    First touch, defensive corners %0.680.57
    OtherGAISAIK
    Throw-in control0.610.63
    The goalkeepersMergim Krasniqi (GAIS)Kristoffer Nordfeldt (AIK)
    Saves5896
    Save %76%71%
    xG prevented49%57%
    Claims107 (93%)68 (87%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: GAIS spelschemaAIK spelschema

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins GAIS vs AIK according to our model?

    The model gives GAIS a 53% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: GAIS 53%, draw 24%, AIK 23%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 58% and under at 42%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in GAIS vs AIK?

    The model expects 1.83 goals (xG) for GAIS and 1.21 for AIK, 3.03 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    GAIS or draw (1X) 77%, AIK or draw (X2) 47% and no draw (12) 76%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.