01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Varbergs BoIS or draw (1X)70%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
Swedish SuperettanPåskbergsvallen, Varberg11°0,6 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaBetBuilders AI model prediction for Varbergs BoIS vs Ljungskile (Swedish Superettan, Sunday, 1 November 2026): Varbergs BoIS win 41%, draw 24%, Ljungskile win 35%. Expected goals (xG): Varbergs BoIS 1.67, Ljungskile 1.32. Most likely score: 1-1 (11%). Over 2.5 goals 57%, both teams to score 60%. Double chance: Varbergs BoIS or draw 65%, Ljungskile or draw 59%. Prediction updated Saturday, 24 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Varbergs BoIS comes into this clash with an edge in the standings but not necessarily in momentum or underlying performance. Despite their 46 points compared to Ljungskile's 32, a closer look reveals an intriguing mismatch. Ljungskile's xPoints of 37.7 suggest they've been unlucky or inefficient, while Varbergs has perhaps overperformed with their 36.1 xPoints. This disparity hints that the visitors might be capable of springing an upset, especially since Ljungskile's style of possession control could trouble Varbergs' preference for counter-attacking.
The expected goals tell another story where Ljungskile edges it slightly with 1.4 xG per match compared to Varbergs' 1.3. This suggests that both teams are evenly matched in terms of creating chances. With both sides averaging 1.4 expected goals against per match, we might see a balanced game, potentially tilting towards those who can capitalize on set pieces or transition moments.
The head-to-head history is too thin to weigh heavily, with only one match in the recent records where Varbergs emerged victorious. While this might give them a psychological edge, it doesn't overshadow Ljungskile's potential to control the pace of the game through possession.
The model favors Varbergs slightly with a 41% chance of victory, but Ljungskile isn't too far behind at 35%. The most likely scorelines of 1-1 (11%) and 2-1 (9%) reinforce the expectation of a tight encounter. The over 2.5 goals probability at 57% and a 60% chance for both teams to score indicate a potential for goals, especially if Ljungskile can disrupt Varbergs' defensive rhythm.
Bookmakers may be undervaluing Ljungskile given their xPoints and style advantage. With odds available at 3.60 for a Ljungskile win, there appears to be value in backing the visitors. This could be the angle for punters willing to bet against the grain in a match that might see the underdogs defying the narrative.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Varbergs BoIS | X | 2 · Ljungskile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.90 | 3.59 | EV+ 34% 3.86 |
| LeoVegas | 1.85 | 3.50 | EV+ 28% 3.70 |
| Nordicbet | 1.90 | 3.59 | EV+ 34% 3.86 |
Odds updated 27 Oct, 13:37
1.85 → 1.85
3.50 → 3.50
3.70 → 3.70
1.64 → 1.67
LeoVegas · 3 recorded price levels · 27/10/2026 → 27/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Superettan data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Varbergs BoIS | Ljungskile |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 46 | 32 |
| xPoints | 36.1 | 37.7 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.35 | 0.23 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.21 | 0.29 |
| Playing style | Varbergs BoIS | Ljungskile |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.36 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.47 |
| xT per match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 36 | 32 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 16 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 312 | 333 |
| Passes against per match | 373 | 355 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.7 | 19.3 |
| Long balls per match | 35 | 36 |
| Set pieces | Varbergs BoIS | Ljungskile |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.16 |
| Corners per match | 5.1 | 5.5 |
| Corners against per match | 5 | 5 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.35 | 0.4 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.66 | 0.62 |
| Other | Varbergs BoIS | Ljungskile |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.46 | 0.54 |
| The goalkeepers | Oscar Ekman (Varbergs BoIS) | Lukas Eriksson (Ljungskile) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 41 | 94 |
| Save % | 65% | 72% |
| xG prevented | 40% | 55% |
| Claims | 84 (94%) | 170 (96%) |
Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Varbergs BoIS spelschemaLjungskile spelschema
The model gives Varbergs BoIS a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Varbergs BoIS 41%, draw 24%, Ljungskile 35%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The model expects 1.67 goals (xG) for Varbergs BoIS and 1.32 for Ljungskile, 2.98 in total.
Varbergs BoIS or draw (1X) 65%, Ljungskile or draw (X2) 59% and no draw (12) 76%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Get the bonus
See ComeOn's terms
Get the bonus
See Hajper's terms
Get the bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.