01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Monza or draw (1X)73%
- Under 3.5 goals78%
Serie AU-Power Stadium, Monza18°9 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 4–0. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Monza vs Cagliari (Serie A, Monday, 19 October 2026): Monza win 42%, draw 27%, Cagliari win 31%. Expected goals (xG): Monza 1.40, Cagliari 1.02. Most likely score: 1-1 (13%). Over 2.5 goals 43%, both teams to score 49%. Double chance: Monza or draw 69%, Cagliari or draw 58%. Prediction updated Saturday, 10 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT: Monza enters the clash with Cagliari as slight favorites, as indicated by the model's 42% winning probability. Despite their lower points tally this season, the hosts hold a crucial edge in expected metrics, boasting 1.7 expected goals per match compared to the visitors' 0.84. This discrepancy highlights Monza's capacity to create goal-scoring opportunities, even if results haven't always reflected this potential. Their xPoints of 9.9 further underscore a potential underperformance, suggesting they might be due for a positive correction.
The small head-to-head sample, consisting of just two matches, shows Cagliari's dominance with two wins. However, given the limited data, it holds less predictive weight compared to current form and expected goals. Monza's superior expected goals against (xGA) of 1.4 compared to Cagliari's 1.7 suggests a defensive advantage for the hosts, potentially stifling the visitors' attacking efforts. With both teams employing a similar low-defense, direct style, the onus will be on who can better capitalize on direct play and transition opportunities.
Weather conditions, with 4.3 mm of rain, suggest a damp field that could stifle attacking fluidity, likely contributing to the model's modest 43% probability for over 2.5 goals. The most probable scorelines—1-1 (13%) and 1-0 (12%)—reflect a tight, low-scoring affair. The model leans towards Monza overall, with 1-1 as the single most likely scoreline, aligning with their expected goals advantage and home ground comfort.
From a betting perspective, there's value in backing the home side. Odds of 2.45 at LeoVegas provide a notable 4% edge over the model's 42% win probability estimation for Monza. Alternatively, both Betsafe and Nordicbet offer 2.4 odds, providing a slightly smaller yet favorable 2% edge. Monza's latent potential and home value present a compelling case this time around.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Monza | X | 2 · Cagliari |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.32 | 3.20 | 3.15 |
| LeoVegas | 2.35 | 3.25 | 3.20 |
| Nordicbet | 2.35 | 3.25 | 3.20 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 1% 2.39 | 3.28 | 3.25 |
Odds updated 19 Oct, 13:35
2.24 → 2.39
3.17 → 3.28
3.42 → 3.25
2.05 → 2.10
Pinnacle · 13 recorded price levels · 10/10/2026 → 19/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Serie A data since 2021.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Monza | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 13 |
| xPoints | 9.9 | 7.5 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 0.84 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Monza | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Field tilt | 0.46 | 0.23 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.64 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 17 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.2 | 0.15 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 23 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 315 | 333 |
| Passes against per match | 427 | 575 |
| Switches of play per match | 25.3 | 16.1 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 26 |
| Set pieces | Monza | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 4.7 | 3.5 |
| Corners against per match | 4.7 | 7 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.43 | 0.29 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.39 | 0.57 |
| Other | Monza | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.78 | 0.6 |
| The goalkeepers | Noel Max Joachim Törnqvist (Monza) | Elia Caprile (Cagliari) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 28 |
| Save % | 73% | 90% |
| xG prevented | 64% | 87% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Monza spelschemaCagliari spelschema
The model gives Monza a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Monza 42%, draw 27%, Cagliari 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 43% and under at 57%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The model expects 1.40 goals (xG) for Monza and 1.02 for Cagliari, 2.42 in total.
Monza or draw (1X) 69%, Cagliari or draw (X2) 58% and no draw (12) 73%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Get the bonus
See ComeOn's terms
Get the bonus
See Hajper's terms
Get the bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.