EFL ChampionshipCardiff City Stadium, Cardiff11°38,5 mm39 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Cardiff CityCardiff CityPossession & high press
    1–0
    Birmingham CityBirmingham CityCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Cardiff City (49%)

    Cardiff City vs Birmingham City · EFL Championship

    1 · Cardiff City 49%X 23%27% Birmingham City · 2

    Prediction summary

    Final score 1–0. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Cardiff City vs Birmingham City (EFL Championship, Saturday, 24 October 2026): Cardiff City win 49%, draw 23%, Birmingham City win 27%. Expected goals (xG): Cardiff City 1.52, Birmingham City 1.42. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 56%, both teams to score 60%. Double chance: Cardiff City or draw 73%, Birmingham City or draw 51%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.

    Bet on this match

    NordicbetVälkommen in i matchen! Skapa ett konto, gör en insättning och hämta ett gratisspel värt 100 kr plus 50 freespins på Pirots 4.Claim the bonus at Nordicbet
    BetsafeHämta ett 100 kr gratisspel + 50 freespins på Pirots 4 när du gör din första insättning hos Betsafe!Claim the bonus at Betsafe
    LeoVegas100 % upp till 600 kr på sport vid första insättningenClaim the bonus at LeoVegas

    18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links

    Analysis: Cardiff City – Birmingham City

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    Cardiff City and Birmingham City face off with a small head-to-head sample, making recent form and expected goals more telling. The hosts have a slight predicted edge, with a 49% chance of victory according to the model. This contrasts with Birmingham's superior points tally and recent form, boasting three consecutive wins and goals in their last ten matches. The visitors are certainly in the swing of things.

    Cardiff, however, possess a slight upper hand in xG, generating 1.9 per match compared to Birmingham’s 1.7. The Bluebirds' possession-based, high-press style could be a deciding factor, though it's Cardiff, not Birmingham, that looks more exposed defensively, with a higher xGA per match (1.5 vs Birmingham's 1.2). Nonetheless, Birmingham's counter-attacking ability and consistent scoring threat shouldn’t be underestimated, even in adverse weather conditions, where rain might dampen the goal count but is already factored into the model's predictions.

    The numbers suggest a tightly contested match likely to produce goals. A 1-1 draw emerges as the most probable outcome, but a 2-1 scoreline in favor of Cardiff isn’t far behind. Despite the expected rainfall, the over 2.5 goals market still leans towards hitting the mark at 56%, while both teams finding the net stands at a solid 60%.

    From a betting perspective, there’s clear value in backing a Cardiff win at odds of 2.7 with Betsafe, LeoVegas, or Nordicbet — all offering a 33% edge compared to the model's rating. Given Cardiff’s xG advantage and home edge, this presents an attractive opportunity despite Birmingham's form.

    Cardiff CityCardiff City
    Form LWLWD
    League ranking xG #3xGA #13xT #1xP/match #15Points #19
    Key players
    • Joel Matthew BaganLWBxG 0.04 · xT 0.24
    • Alexander Sean Pablo RobertsonCMxG 0.07 · xT 0.08
    • Yousef SalechFxG 0.57 · xT -0.04
    Birmingham CityBirmingham City
    Form WDWWW
    League ranking xG #6xGA #8xT #5xP/match #6Points #5
    Key players
    • Christoph KlarerCBxG 0.10 · xT 0.06
    • Tomoki IwataCMxG 0.09 · xT 0.09
    • Alexander William CochraneLBxG 0.01 · xT 0.17
    Final score
    1 – 0
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Cardiff City 49% · Draw 23% · Birmingham City 27%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - CardiffBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 6,08fair 8,12-25 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - BirminghamBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 5,42fair 9,27-42 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Cardiff City – Birmingham City

    Predicted score matrix

    Birmingham City →
    Cardiff City →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.6%
    0–17.2%
    0–25.3%
    0–32.5%
    0–4+1.2%
    1
    1–07.7%
    1–111.7%
    1–28.1%
    1–33.8%
    1–4+1.9%
    2
    2–06.1%
    2–18.7%
    2–26.2%
    2–32.9%
    2–4+1.4%
    3
    3–03.1%
    3–14.4%
    3–23.1%
    3–31.5%
    3–4+0.7%
    4+
    4+–01.6%
    4+–12.3%
    4+–21.7%
    4+–30.8%
    4+–4+0.4%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-28%
    4. 4.1-08%
    5. 5.0-17%
    Expected goals
    1,52–1,42
    Both teams to score
    60%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,9
    Under 2,544%
    @2.60EV+13%
    Over 2,556%
    @1.52

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Cardiff City to win49%
    • Over 1.5 goals80%

    Combined probability

    32%

    Fair odds

    3.15

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Cardiff City to win49%
    • Over 2.5 goals56%
    • Yousef Salech to score28%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score60%
    • Over 2.5 goals56%
    • Yousef Salech to score28%
    • Christoph Klarer to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Cardiff City49% probability@2.77PinnacleEV+37%reference odds
    • 1 · Cardiff City49% probability@2.75LeoVegasEV+36%reference odds
    • 1 · Cardiff City49% probability@2.70BetsafeEV+33%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Cardiff CityX2 · Birmingham City
    Betsafe
    EV+ 33%
    2.70
    3.602.40
    LeoVegas
    EV+ 36%
    2.75
    3.752.40
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 33%
    2.70
    3.602.40
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 37%
    2.77
    3.922.37

    Odds updated 24 Oct, 12:36

    Odds movement

    1+5 %
    38 %33 %

    2.63 → 2.77

    X+5 %
    28 %23 %

    3.72 → 3.92

    2-4 %
    42 %37 %

    2.47 → 2.37

    Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 22/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Birmingham City come into this round on 3 straight wins.
    • Birmingham City have scored in 10 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Cardiff City
    Birmingham City
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Cardiff City (18–17)
    Birmingham City (20–11)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Cardiff City
    Alexander Sean Pablo Robertson: 275 passningar, xT 0.34RobertsonGabriel Jeremiah Adedayo Osho: 261 passningar, xT 0.41OshoNathan Wallace Newman Trott: 212 passningar, xT 0.23TrottJoel Matthew Bagan: 202 passningar, xT 1.17BaganPerry Tian Hee Ng: 170 passningar, xT 0.19NgKrystian Bielik: 167 passningar, xT 0.33BielikJoel Colwill: 106 passningar, xT -0.01ColwillOllie Anthony Tanner: 92 passningar, xT 1.26TannerDylan Lawlor: 85 passningar, xT 0.11LawlorChristopher Anthony Willock: 78 passningar, xT 0.94WillockDavid Turnbull: 76 passningar, xT 0.01Turnbull
    Birmingham City
    Christoph Klarer: 250 passningar, xT 0.24KlarerAlexander William Cochrane: 240 passningar, xT 0.74CochraneBright Osayi-Samuel: 223 passningar, xT 0.77Osayi-SamuelTomoki Iwata: 199 passningar, xT 0.38IwataPhil Yannik Neumann: 176 passningar, xT 0.62NeumannJhon Solís: 137 passningar, xT 0.05SolísLiam Millar: 122 passningar, xT 1.1MillarJay Stansfield: 99 passningar, xT 0.58StansfieldJames Beadle: 80 passningar, xT 0.21BeadlePatrick Roberts: 75 passningar, xT 0.36RobertsCarlos Vicente Robles: 74 passningar, xT -0.04Robles
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Cardiff City
    Alexander Sean Pablo Robertson: 275 passningar, xT 0.34RobertsonGabriel Jeremiah Adedayo Osho: 261 passningar, xT 0.41OshoNathan Wallace Newman Trott: 212 passningar, xT 0.23TrottJoel Matthew Bagan: 202 passningar, xT 1.17BaganPerry Tian Hee Ng: 170 passningar, xT 0.19NgKrystian Bielik: 167 passningar, xT 0.33BielikJoel Colwill: 106 passningar, xT -0.01ColwillOllie Anthony Tanner: 92 passningar, xT 1.26TannerDylan Lawlor: 85 passningar, xT 0.11LawlorChristopher Anthony Willock: 78 passningar, xT 0.94WillockDavid Turnbull: 76 passningar, xT 0.01Turnbull
    Birmingham City
    Christoph Klarer: 250 passningar, xT 0.24KlarerAlexander William Cochrane: 240 passningar, xT 0.74CochraneBright Osayi-Samuel: 223 passningar, xT 0.77Osayi-SamuelTomoki Iwata: 199 passningar, xT 0.38IwataPhil Yannik Neumann: 176 passningar, xT 0.62NeumannJhon Solís: 137 passningar, xT 0.05SolísLiam Millar: 122 passningar, xT 1.1MillarJay Stansfield: 99 passningar, xT 0.58StansfieldJames Beadle: 80 passningar, xT 0.21BeadlePatrick Roberts: 75 passningar, xT 0.36RobertsCarlos Vicente Robles: 74 passningar, xT -0.04Robles

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCardiff CityBirmingham City
    Points1120
    xPoints14.517.3
    xG per match1.91.7
    xGA per match1.51.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.270.26
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.30.2
    Playing styleCardiff CityBirmingham City
    Build-up efficiency0.340.33
    Field tilt0.650.56
    xT per match1.31.2
    xTA per match0.710.84
    Won balls, offensive half2527
    Pressing intensity0.230.24
    Pressing efficiency0.320.33
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.270.31
    Entries into the box per match1514
    Entries into the box against1111
    Pass completion %0.780.69
    Pass completion % under pressure0.760.66
    Passes per match429303
    Passes against per match240291
    Switches of play per match42.220.5
    Long balls per match4228
    Set piecesCardiff CityBirmingham City
    xG from free kicks0.020.07
    Corners per match7.25.7
    Corners against per match5.24.5
    xG per corner0.050.05
    xGA per corner against0.030.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.190.47
    First touch, defensive corners %0.590.58
    OtherCardiff CityBirmingham City
    Throw-in control0.730.69
    The goalkeepersNathan Wallace Newman Trott (Cardiff City)James Beadle (Birmingham City)
    Saves4430
    Save %72%73%
    xG prevented49%51%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Cardiff City spelschemaBirmingham City spelschema

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Cardiff City vs Birmingham City according to our model?

    The model gives Cardiff City a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cardiff City 49%, draw 23%, Birmingham City 27%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.

    How many goals are expected in Cardiff City vs Birmingham City?

    The model expects 1.52 goals (xG) for Cardiff City and 1.42 for Birmingham City, 2.94 in total.

    What does the model say about double chance?

    Cardiff City or draw (1X) 73%, Birmingham City or draw (X2) 51% and no draw (12) 77%.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.