01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Cardiff City to win49%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
EFL ChampionshipCardiff City Stadium, Cardiff11°38,5 mm39 km/h
Läs på svenskaFinal score 1–0. Before kick-off the model's prediction was as follows. BetBuilders AI model prediction for Cardiff City vs Birmingham City (EFL Championship, Saturday, 24 October 2026): Cardiff City win 49%, draw 23%, Birmingham City win 27%. Expected goals (xG): Cardiff City 1.52, Birmingham City 1.42. Most likely score: 1-1 (12%). Over 2.5 goals 56%, both teams to score 60%. Double chance: Cardiff City or draw 73%, Birmingham City or draw 51%. Prediction updated Friday, 16 October 2026.
18+ · Gamble responsibly · stodlinjen.se · Affiliate links
Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Cardiff City and Birmingham City face off with a small head-to-head sample, making recent form and expected goals more telling. The hosts have a slight predicted edge, with a 49% chance of victory according to the model. This contrasts with Birmingham's superior points tally and recent form, boasting three consecutive wins and goals in their last ten matches. The visitors are certainly in the swing of things.
Cardiff, however, possess a slight upper hand in xG, generating 1.9 per match compared to Birmingham’s 1.7. The Bluebirds' possession-based, high-press style could be a deciding factor, though it's Cardiff, not Birmingham, that looks more exposed defensively, with a higher xGA per match (1.5 vs Birmingham's 1.2). Nonetheless, Birmingham's counter-attacking ability and consistent scoring threat shouldn’t be underestimated, even in adverse weather conditions, where rain might dampen the goal count but is already factored into the model's predictions.
The numbers suggest a tightly contested match likely to produce goals. A 1-1 draw emerges as the most probable outcome, but a 2-1 scoreline in favor of Cardiff isn’t far behind. Despite the expected rainfall, the over 2.5 goals market still leans towards hitting the mark at 56%, while both teams finding the net stands at a solid 60%.
From a betting perspective, there’s clear value in backing a Cardiff win at odds of 2.7 with Betsafe, LeoVegas, or Nordicbet — all offering a 33% edge compared to the model's rating. Given Cardiff’s xG advantage and home edge, this presents an attractive opportunity despite Birmingham's form.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Cardiff City | X | 2 · Birmingham City |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 33% 2.70 | 3.60 | 2.40 |
| LeoVegas | EV+ 36% 2.75 | 3.75 | 2.40 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 33% 2.70 | 3.60 | 2.40 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 37% 2.77 | 3.92 | 2.37 |
Odds updated 24 Oct, 12:36
2.63 → 2.77
3.72 → 3.92
2.47 → 2.37
Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 22/10/2026 → 24/10/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Cardiff City | Birmingham City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 11 | 20 |
| xPoints | 14.5 | 17.3 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.27 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Cardiff City | Birmingham City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| xT per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 0.71 | 0.84 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.76 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 429 | 303 |
| Passes against per match | 240 | 291 |
| Switches of play per match | 42.2 | 20.5 |
| Long balls per match | 42 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Cardiff City | Birmingham City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 7.2 | 5.7 |
| Corners against per match | 5.2 | 4.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.19 | 0.47 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.58 |
| Other | Cardiff City | Birmingham City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Nathan Wallace Newman Trott (Cardiff City) | James Beadle (Birmingham City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 44 | 30 |
| Save % | 72% | 73% |
| xG prevented | 49% | 51% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Hela spelschemat med svårighetsgrad per match: Cardiff City spelschemaBirmingham City spelschema
The model gives Cardiff City a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cardiff City 49%, draw 23%, Birmingham City 27%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The model expects 1.52 goals (xG) for Cardiff City and 1.42 for Birmingham City, 2.94 in total.
Cardiff City or draw (1X) 73%, Birmingham City or draw (X2) 51% and no draw (12) 77%.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

Min. insättning 100 kr. Omsättning 6× inom 60 dagar, odds från 1,80
Get the bonus
See ComeOn's terms
Get the bonus
See Hajper's terms
Get the bonusPredictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.